****View the attachment. It gives an outline/guide on how the paper should be written!****

Need a separate abstract and conclusion 

2.5 pages of full content (not including abstract and conclusion) 

APA Format 

12 Point Times New Roman 

Please use at least three sources and cite the sources within the article. 

Your assignment is to create a argumentative/persuasive research paper given one of the following options:

Option 1. Argue for or against the best or worst investment choices.

Option 2. Argue for or against the acceptance of a rejected investment.

Option 3. Argue for or against the acceptance of two projects rather than one project.

The paper should cite approximately three peer reviewed full text journal articles retrieved from ProQuest, BE & T, InfoTrac, and Academic OneFile. Your paper should integrate at least the following elements:

•   The presentation of a firm position regarding your stance or theory.

•   An offering of a strong position using evidence-based argumentation.

•   An address of opposing points as to present a well-rounded argument controlling personal

  biases and strengthening your argument while diminishing the opposition’s points.

•   An effort to use evidence and argument flow as to instill a sense of trust into your reader.

****View the attachment. It gives an outline/guide on how the paper should be written!****

Need a separate abstract and conclusion 

2.5 pages of full content (not including abstract and conclusion) 

APA Format 

12 Point Times New Roman 

Please use at least three sources and cite the sources within the article. 

Your assignment is to create a argumentative/persuasive research paper given one of the following options:

Option 1. Argue for or against the best or worst investment choices.

Option 2. Argue for or against the acceptance of a rejected investment.

Option 3. Argue for or against the acceptance of two projects rather than one project.

The paper should cite approximately three peer reviewed full text journal articles retrieved from ProQuest, BE & T, InfoTrac, and Academic OneFile. Your paper should integrate at least the following elements:

•   The presentation of a firm position regarding your stance or theory.

•   An offering of a strong position using evidence-based argumentation.

•   An address of opposing points as to present a well-rounded argument controlling personal

  biases and strengthening your argument while diminishing the opposition’s points.

•   An effort to use evidence and argument flow as to instill a sense of trust into your reader.