case study

Read “Guide to Case Analysis” (On Blackboard)

Please answer the following questions. Please submit answers that are: typed, double spaced, with 1” margins and 12pt. Times New Roman font. Please submit your answers in either the .DOC or .DOCX format.

(1) Summarize the “Objectives of Case Analysis” section of the guide. What are the objectives of case analysis? (Suggested length 1 page)

NOTE: USE YOUR OWN WORDS TO SUMMARIZE THIS SECTION.

(2) Please write a summary of Table 1 – Key Financial Ratios: How to calculate them and what they mean. Please include the formula for each of the ratios as well as a description of what it shows in the following areas: Profit, Liquidity, Leverage, Activity and Other Important Measures. (Suggested length 2-3 pages)

NOTE: USE YOUR OWN WORDS TO SUMMARIZE THIS SECTION.

(3) Summarize “The Ten Commandments of Case Analysis”. What are the elements of an excellent analysis of a case study? (Suggested length 1 page)

NOTE: USE YOUR OWN WORDS TO SUMMARIZE THIS SECTION.

NOTES FOR ASSIGNMENT PREPARATION:

Please submit your answers in essay format and not bullet format, using proper grammar and spelling.

If your paragraphs are longer than 6 sentences or approximately 1/3 of a page, points will be deducted.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Case Study

12 Angry Men, 1957 Movie, with Henry Fonda, dealing with a 12 person jury charged with
deciding the guilt or innocence of a young man charged with murdering his father.
It is required that you rent, purchase, borrow or obtain this movie and watch it whatever
number of times (Note: The movie is posted within the course, itself.) required for you to
construct a paper that responds to the following requirements. In additon, the movie is
incorporated into the course content:

Page 1 – Cover Title Page

Page 2 – Brief list of the major case issues that are instrumental in deciding the jury
conclusion.

Pages 3-8: Jury Member No. 8, Character played by Henry Fonda. Address the following three
(3) questions in a minimum of six (6) pages:
a) How would you describe his negotiations approach?
b) There are at least forty (40) Negotiations techniques defined and discussed in the course
text. Please identify at least ten (10) that Juror No. 8 used during this movie. Also, clearly
describe the circumstance where in the movie he used such technique(s). Then describe the
result from its use.
c) Identify at least two (2) compromises that he had made? Explain what they were and the
effective result of each.

Pages 9-13: From your list of ten (10) Negotiations techniques that Juror No. 8 used, compose
a minimum of five(5) pages to complete a) and b) below:
a) Select five (5) and write a detailed explanation of how your use of these techniques could
be applied in your personal and business life.
b) For ech of the five (5) chosen techniques, write and explain the result you would hope to
achieve by use of that technique.
Pages 14-16: Jury Member No. 4, Character played by E.G. Marshall. Address the following
questions. This will require a minimum of three (3) pages:
a) How would you describe this individual’s negotiations strategy and approach? Use the
terminology defined from the text and how he implements that approach and strategy.
b) What was the basis of his “guilty” analysis? Explain his justification for each point.
c) What negotiations techniques were employed by Juror No. 8 to change Juror No. 4?s mind
and vote differently? Explain the circumstances and detail involved.
Page 17-18: Juror No. 3, Character Played by Lee J. Cobb. Address the following questions:
a) What is the strategy of Juror No. 3?

b) What is Juror No. 3’s style and approach with the other Juror members? Please explain and give examples as part of your response. Be specific.
c) Towards the end of the movie, when there were only three (3) jurors remaining that were
voting guilty, what role did juror No. 3 play in changing the vote position of the last three jurors.
Explain the incident, circumstances and the influence that juror no. 3 had on these three (3) jurors to change their mind.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Is this question part of your Assignment?

Get expert help

Girl in a jacket


We are a team of academic consultants with extensive experience in writing academic papers for college students in the US, Canada, UK, AU, and other parts of the world.

We help students with both technical and non-technical assignments across all majors & academic disciplines.

Unlike what our name suggests, we research and draft everything word for word. We do not use AI or any rewriting tool! We provide Turnitin reports for AI & Turnitin alongside every paper.

Need help? Send us your assignment now!

description here description here description here