See attachment for requirement. The following are some additional requirement.

Your Part I Review Paper grades have been posted.  It is very important that you follow instructions for all your assignments.  Some of you did not cite readings from the curriculum, as instructed, in your Part 1 Review Paper.  In lieu of the curriculum readings, some of you extensively cited outside sources.  Your knowledge of the development literature outside of the readings in the syllabus is NOT a judgement criterion when I grade your paper.  I have instructed the class to base their assignments on curriculum texts in order to enforce reading and to better ensure that students write their own essays and papers instead of procuring them.  

To be clear, you should address ALL the three points below in your Part 2 Review paper. If you do not do so, you will risk getting an F for the Part 2 Review Paper for not following instructions.  In short, follow the instructions.

1) How have IFIs policies and neoliberal economic coordination negatively impacted poor and working-class women in the Global South?  April Ane Knutson’s “Haitian Women in the New World Order”’ and Hester Eisenstein’s “In the Global South ‘Women’ Replace Development” touch on this matter.  

2) How have liberal programs of amelioration failed and/or succeeded in addressing poverty and destitution in the Global South?  James Petras’ “NGOs: In the Service of Imperialism”, Mike Davis’ “Illusions of Self-Help”, Hester Eisenstein’s “In the Global South ‘Women’ Replace Development”, and Ananya Roy’s “Small Worlds: The Democratization of Capital and Development” touch on this matter.

3) Argue if you agree or disagree whether the Washington Consensus and IFIs are primarily responsible for poverty in the Global South and if the amelioration measures mentioned in the readings of part 2 are adequate.  You are welcome to use outside sources.  The use of outside sources is optional.

The use of outside sources is appropriate for the third point because if you critique the curriculum readings, it would be useful to marshal in other texts to corroborate your position.  To be clear, outside sources are NOT substitutes for texts in the curriculum.  Again, if you do not base your Part 2 Review Paper on texts in the curriculum, you risk getting an F for the assignment and since this assignment is 40% of your grade, you will naturally risk failing the course.

Answer questions in short essay form.  Write in Times New Roman, double-spaced, 12 point font.   Your responses in total should not exceed one page.  This  is due via Turnitin on Thursday, April 20, 2017 at 11:59pm.  

Sarah Babb. “The Washington Consensus as transnational policy paradigm: Its origins, trajectory and likely successor” Review of International Political Economy, 2012 Vol. 20, No. 2, 268–297.

1.According to Sarah Babb, what were the objectives of the Baker Plan?

2.Represent Sarah Babb’s position on the role and changing character of market liberalization conditionality during and after the Washington Consensus era.

: Case Study Guidelines
Each student will receive a different brief case study. You will write a paper that includes the following
topics and then summarized into a case plan. The first part of the paper should include the following elements:
1. Title Page: Your name, the date, paper assignment, and the name of the scenario.
2. Introduction: Include a sentence or two to briefly give the name of the individual or family you are working with and identify the presenting problem(s) the individual or family is experiencing.

Click here for more on this paper…….

….

3. Questions for client: Develop a list of questions that you need to ask the client or other people in the scenario to better understand what is going on. Write these questions as you would actually ask them of the client(s).
4. Research questions: Write several questions for your own research. What do you need to know in order to be competent to help in this situation as a social worker. Write these questions out. This is the “F” part of the Evidence Based Process = “Formulate a Question”. At least one of these questions should be about the most effective intervention strategy for dealing with the problem(s) in the case scenario.
5. Discuss ethical issues you might need/want to consider and how you will address those issues. Refer to the ethical principles from the NASW code of ethics we talked about in the earlier part of the semester (and in chapter 4 of the textbook). Delineate which standard(s) or core principles are the most important ones to think about. For example, the issue at hand might be a conflict between the standard of self-determination from the NASW code section 1.02 and the standard of confidentiality (section 1.07). Give examples of how this could play out in the cast study.

Click here for more on this paper…….

….

The second part of your paper is a case plan which summarizes what information you have gathered and your proposed treatment intervention approach. To do this you will need to research the questions from the above section 3. This is the “L” as in “Locate the best evidence”.
Your case plan should include the following:
1. Assessment of strengths and barriers.
2. At least TWO Goals and with each goal a clearly defined and measurable objective. Remember a goal is the future desired state, i.e. “John will have a healthy and positive relationship with his partner based on open and clear communication”. Objectives are shorter term and measurable (SMART). Don’t just state what you will do, which is neither a goal or objective.
3. For each objective, write a brief treatment plan, including specific intervention modalities and support for your decision(s). This is the “A” part of the EBP = “Assess the quality of the evidence”. Include and integrate your research in your paper (i.e. what you found on in answering part 3 above), accurately documented in APA style (i.e. using in-text citations and a reference list at the end). Describe the interventions, why you think they are the best option, and how effective they have been shown to be based on prior research.
4. Examine the interventions you have chosen as the ‘best options’ for this client and write a paragraph or two on your assessment of whether this intervention is really a viable option for you as a BSW level social worker to do yourself.
5. Finally, identify at least two agencies or individuals in your local community (i.e. 50 mile radius of where you live or your hometown) and report where you could refer the client to receive the interventions you talked about.
Save your write up in Microsoft Word format and upload to the ASULearn site.

Click here for more on this paper…….

….