I don’t understand this Writing question and need help to study.
Respond by Day 5 to two colleagues and explain in what ways you agree or disagree with the permissibility of the identified scenarios. Justify your reaction. $5 Post
Barbara Geddes article “How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answer You Get: Selection Bias Comparative Politics” is on point about biases on the dependent variable conclusions. “The problem with selecting cases for study on the dependent variable sterns from the logic of explanation” (Geddes, 1990, p. 132). In addition, the researchers observations on different ethnicities on the dependent variable and independent variable because of their personal views (Geddes, 1990). Geddes (1990) explained that the dependent variable selection is often considered because the relationships does not exist within this research. Indeed, the dependent variables does not tied into the real world life due to the researchers bias on dependent variable (Geddes, 1990). Unfortunately, the researcher used the ethnicities as the dependent variable because of the “growing” countries rates and etc (Geddes, 1990). The biggest mistake that the research has done jumping into conclusions way too soon because that causes the research to go wrong based on the bias. In addition, the correlation in the research causes the relationship between dependent variable to have connection within the research. One scenario may be okay to choose appropriate cases base on dependent variables to conduct the research correctly accordingly. When conducting the dependent variable to its evidence like most people in the countries are currently suffering from economic crisis during the Coronavirus also known as (COVID-19). This would be easy for the researcher to this scenario as their variables to conduct their research correctly and accordingly.
Reference
Geddes, B. (1990). How the cases you choose affect the answers you get: Selection bias in comparative politics. Political Analysis, 2(1), 131–150. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.372.5896&rep=rep1&type=pdf
