I’m trying to learn for my Computer Science class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

Discussion 1

• Explain the terms factorial design, factor, cell, main effect and interaction. .
• Explain the assumptions required for a factorial design ANOVA.

Please make your initial post and two response posts substantive. A substantive post will do at least TWO of the following:

• Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic
• Answer a question (in detail) posted by another student or the instructor
• Provide extensive additional information on the topic
• Explain, define, or analyze the topic in detail
• Share an applicable personal experience
• Provide an outside source (for example, an article from the UC Library) that applies to the topic, along with additional information about the topic or the source (please cite properly in APA)
• Make an argument concerning the topic.
• At least one scholarly source should be used in the initial discussion thread. Be sure to use information from your readings and other sources from the UC Library. Use proper citations and references in your post.

Note: Your answer must be 800 words and add at-least 3 references.

2.Give an example of a pseudoscience, and why you feel this is a pseudoscience and not legitimate science.

Discussion 1
A patient presents to a physician’s office with tendency to bleed. During history-taking, the physician elicited a family history of anemia. He ordered laboratory tests to determine the cause of the bleeding disorder. What is the nature of the lab tests, that is, what do the tests measure and how do they help the doctor make a diagnosis?
Discussion 2
How do you decide on which disease to target for eradication?

DISCUSSION 1 – DUE IN 5 HOURS

300 WORDS ONLY

A person’s health may be greatly impacted by his or her access to timely, appropriate care. Yet, in the United States, there are marked differences in the quality of services that are available and in each individual’s use of those services. The cost of health care, for instance, can influence a person’s decision to visit the doctor or fill a prescription. What other factors impact health care-related decisions? In this Discussion, you will examine two case studies that illustrate dilemmas related to cost, quality, and access to health care, and consider the potential influence these dilemmas can have on a person’s health, financial standing, and quality of life.

Read the Module 2 Discussion 1 Case Studies, found in this module’s Learning Resources. Review the information presented in the Learning Resources, including Chapter 12 in the Shi and Singh (2015) textbook and the websites and articles. Analyze the circumstances presented in the two case studies, and consider the following questions:

• Analyze at least two barriers in the U.S. health care delivery system related to cost, quality, and/or access that are evident in each person’s scenario.

• Analyze how health insurance may influence concerns or decisions related to cost, quality, and/or access to health care for each person.

• Explain potential health care outcomes for each scenario.

Reminder: Use and identify sources to support your posting and responses.

Module 2 Discussion 1 Case Studies

Raymond

Raymond is a 54-year-old man who lives in a rural part of Mississippi. He is a skilled worker, but his job does not provide health insurance. Raymond does not qualify for Medicaid and cannot pay for health insurance. He has not received consistent or coordinated healthcare for most of his life. The closest clinic is over 30 miles away, and he does not have the money for both the healthcare and medical care services and gas. Raymond has been diagnosed with hypertension, and his family history includes pulmonary embolisms and heart disease.

Emmanuel

Emmanuel is a 55-year-old man who lives in Jackson, Mississippi. He is an office manager and receives insurance from his employer. Emmanuel has had annual medical and dental exams from the same providers for several years. Emmanuel has a family history of Type 2 diabetes and his latest blood test results showed his sugar levels were higher than expected. Emmanuel received a referral from his primary care provider (PCP) to an endocrinologist and a registered dietitian, and he was instructed by his PCP to increase his physical activity.

submit a 300-WORDS pape, due in 5 hours