I’m studying for my Health & Medical class and need an explanation.
nit 3 Assessment – Research a Social Issue
DueSunday by 11:59pm
Points85
Submittinga text entry box or a file upload
Instructions
In Unit 1, you identified recent technological advancements that have impacted human beings. In Unit 2, you analyzed the life cycle of a social problem related to that technological advancement.
In this week’s writing assignment, you are asked to analyze the psychological/sociological dimensions of the technology you analyzed in last week’s writing assignment. Specifically, you are asked to write an outline (see attached outline example) that discusses the impact of this technology on the individual (emotions, mental health, well-being, substance use, cognitive functioning, etc.) and society (social mobility, public health trends, crime rates, social cohesion, political stability, etc.). To this end, please follow these directions:
First, use the research methods we developed in Unit 2 to locate 8 articles related to the social problem you wrote about in the most recent discussion. Two of these articles can be ones you have already used.
Second, please describe 2 psychological and 2 sociological impacts of this technology. Be certain to explain the significance of these impacts rather than just listing each item.
Make sure to support each point with facts derived from valid outside sources selected with the methods covered in this week’s discussion post. Please submit your writing assignment in an outline format. Be sure to cite all sources using APA formatting style (Links to an external site.).
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
26.0 pts
Level 5
Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.
23.0 pts
Level 4
Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.
21.0 pts
Level 3
Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.
18.0 pts
Level 2
Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.
16.0 pts
Level 1
Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.
0.0 pts
Level 0
The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions
26.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P
26.0 pts
Level 5
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
23.0 pts
Level 4
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
21.0 pts
Level 3
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
18.0 pts
Level 2
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
16.0 pts
Level 1
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
0.0 pts
Level 0
The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
26.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology
17.0 pts
Level 5
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.
15.0 pts
Level 4
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.
14.0 pts
Level 3
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.
12.0 pts
Level 2
Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.
10.0 pts
Level 1
Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.
0.0 pts
Level 0
The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.
17.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
12.0 pts
Level 5
The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
11.0 pts
Level 4
The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.
10.0 pts
Level 3
The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication
9.0 pts
Level 2
The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
7.0 pts
Level 1
The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0.0 pts
Level 0
The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
12.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I
4.0 pts
Level 5
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.
3.5 pts
Level 4
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.
3.0 pts
Level 3
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.
2.5 pts
Level 2
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.
2.0 pts
Level 1
The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements
We are a team of academic consultants with extensive experience in writing academic papers for college students in the US, Canada, UK, AU, and other parts of the world.
We help students with both technical and non-technical assignments across all majors & academic disciplines.
Unlike what our name suggests, we research and draft everything word for word. We do not use AI or any rewriting tool! We provide Turnitin reports for AI & Turnitin alongside every paper.
Need help? Send us your assignment now!
